Information for contributors

to peer reviewed proceedings from the international scientific conference Adult Education 2018 - Transformation in the Era of Digitization and Artificial Intelligence

Please, send the papers electronically to: jarmila.salivarova@pedf.cuni.cz by 31 January 2019 at the latest. The Proceedings of the 8th International Adult Education Conference 2018 (ISBN 978-80-906894-4-2) will be published by the Czech Andragogical Society, Prague, with the participation of the Faculty of Education of Charles University. It will be requested again that the proceedings are included in the WoS Conference Proceedings Citation Index.

The following will be accepted for publication on the basis of a successful peer review process:
Empirical studies (in exceptional cases also theoretical and review studies), which must be presented on 6 to 8 standard pages (ie 10 800 - 14 400 characters, including spaces); Times New Roman font, font size 12. Without any graphic or other modifications. The texts will be published in the author's language, i.e. Czech, Slovak or English, and will be accompanied by abstracts and key words in English. All page margins: 2.5 cm, single line spacing. Paragraph indent - first line 0.75 cm; not to use spaces or to point out paragraphs or subtitles.

Paper structure:
The name of the paper in Czech /Slovak and English; the name(s) and surname of the author(s); abstract in Czech /Slovak and English; keywords in Czech/Slovak and English; the text itself and exact contact details of the author(s). Abbreviations can not be used to indicate author's affiliation !!! (It is necessary to state the exact full official name of the department, faculty and university).

Example:

Vývoj kompetenčního paradigmatu v edukačních vědách

Development of Competence Paradigm in Educational Sciences
Jan Novák

Abstrakt:

text (max 5 lines,.i.e. max. 350 characters)

Abstract:

text in English

Klíčová slova:

4 to 6 words or phrases in Czech, Slovak or English

Key words:

4 to 6 words or phrases in English (for English papers they are given in Czech)

Here starts the text itself of the paper

Paper structure:
Introduction; own text divided into chapters (eg 1, 2, ...); conclusion; literature - see ČSN ISO 690, current version ISO-690-2 (01 0197) or APA citation standard and author's contact details (including titles and addresses of the organisation, i.e. street, no., postal code and e-mail address). Please give the exact full names of university faculties and departments, do not use abbreviations! Insert tables and charts as images. The name of the table / chart / image is: Table 1: Table name, Chart 1: Chart name ... Give the source below each picture / table / graph, example: Source: Armstrong (1999, p. 52) or Source: Own work

Example of paper structure:

Introduction
Text….

1. Chapter (not required, but appropriate)

Text ...

2. Chapters (not required, but appropriate)

Text ...

3. Chapters (not compulsory, but appropriate)

Text ...

Conclusion (or Summary of Research / Recommendations for practice / Process Optimization Proposal)

Text ...

Literature (according to ČSN or APA)

Example 1:

BERTL, I. and J. NOVÁK, J. Phenomenon of Financial Literacy of Adults in Educational and Psychosocial Context. Andragogical Revue, 2016, vol. VIII, No. 1, pp. 13-31. ISSN 1804-1698.
VÁCLAVKOVÁ, M. Further Education of Upper Secondary School Teachers in the Czech Republic in the Context of Forming Regional Traditions. In: Cultivating and forming regional traditions by the Visegrad Group teachers. Katowice: University of Silesia, 2015, pp. 59-81. ISBN 978-83-8012-470-7.
VETESKA, J. Gerontagogika: psychological and andragogic specifics of education and activation of seniors. Praha: Česká andragogická společnost, 2016. 180 s. ISBN 978-80-905460-4-2.

Publishers may not be stated in abbreviated form !!!

Example 2:

Literature / References (APA citation standard)
Dočekal, V. (2012). Experiential, Experienced, or Experienced Learning? E-pedagogium, 12 (1), 9-17. Available from http://www.pdf.upol.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/PdF/e-pedagogium/2012/E-pedagogium-2012.pdf
Hloušková, L. (2008). Changing school culture in pedagogical discourse. Brno: Masaryk University.
Larsson, E. (Ed.). (2010). Playing reality. Available from http://interactingarts.org/pdf/Playing%20Reality%20(2010).pdf
Šeďová, K. (2012). Pupils laugh at teachers: Forms and functions of school humor focused on teachers. Pedagogical orientation, 22 (1), 41-65.
Veenman, M., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuisen, J. (2004). The relationship between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14 (1), 89-104.
Zounek, J., & Šeďova, K. (2009). Teachers and Technology. Between traditional and modern concepts. Brno: Paido.

Example - do not use abbreviations !!!:

Contact details:
doc. PhDr. Jan Novák, CSc.
Department of Pedagogy
Faculty of Arts
Charles University
Náměstí Jana Palacha 2
116 38 Prague 1
Czech Republic
E-mail: novak@cuni.cz

Scientific Committee of the Conference:

prof. PhDr. Beáta Balogová, PhD. Filozofická fakulta, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově
prof. PhDr. Martin Bílek, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
doc. Mgr. Miroslav Dopita, Ph.D. Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
doc. PaedDr. Pavel Doulík, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně
prof. dr. sc. Željko Dugac, Ph.D. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Academy of Sciences and Arts, Croatian
doc. PaedDr. Ctibor Határ, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre
prof. Pertti Kansanen, Ph.D. Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki
prof. PhDr. Soňa Kariková, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
prof. PhDr. Beáta Kosová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
prof. PaedDr. Miroslav Krystoň, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
prof. PhDr. Mária Machalová, CSc. Pravoslávna bohoslovecká fakulta, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove
doc. PhDr. Josef Malach, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita
doc. PaedDr. Marianna Müller de Morais, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre
prof. PhDr. Milan Nakonečný Česká andragogická společnost
prof. PaedDr. Michal Nedělka, Dr. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
doc. PaedDr. Lenka Pasternáková, PhD. Fakulta humanitných a prírodných vied, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově
doc. PaedDr. Ivan Pavlov, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
prof. PhDr. Gabriela Petrová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre
doc. PhDr. Ivana Pirohová, PhD. Fakulta humanitných a prírodných vied, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově
dr. hab Beata Pituła, prof. nzw. w Pol. Śl. Silesian University of Technology, College of Social Sciences
and Foreign Philologies dr hab. prof. UP Katarzyna Potyrała Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow
prof. PhDr. Jan Průcha, DrSc., dr. h. c. Česká andragogická společnost
prof. PhDr. Viera Prusáková, CSc. Vysoká škola ekonómie a manažmentu verejnej správy v Bratislave
dr hab. prof. UP Andrzej Ryk Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow
doc. Ing. Mgr. Radomír Saliger, Ph.D. Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany
dr hab. prof. UP Zofia Szarota Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow
doc. PhDr. Jana Marie Šafránková, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
doc. PhDr. Markéta Švamberk Šauerová, Ph.D. Vysoká škola tělesné výchovy a sportu PALESTRA
doc. PhDr. Jiří Škoda, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně
doc. Ing. David Vaněček, Ph.D. Masarykův ústav vyšších studií, České vysoké učení technické v Praze
doc. PhDr. Ladislav Vaska, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
prof. PaedDr. Radka Wildová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Organizational and Programme Committee of the Conference:

PhDr. Ing. Ivan Bertl, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně
PhDr. Slavomil Fischer, Ph.D., MBA Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně
Mgr. Milan Chmura, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita
Mgr. Danuše Dvořáková Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
PhDr. Dominika Kadlubeková, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre
PhDr. Jana Kohnová, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
PhDr. Ľubomír Kubínyi, Ph.D. Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany
PhDr. Martin Kursch, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
Ing. Lucie Paulovčáková, Ph.D., MBA Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
PhDr. Jarmila Salivarová, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
Mgr. Ing. Leopold Skoruša, Ph.D. Univerzita obrany, Brno

Mgr. Zuzana Svobodová, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
ing PhDr. Łukasz Tomczyk, PhD Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow
PhDr. Michaela Tureckiová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
RNDr. Ing. Eva Urbanová Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Thematic blocks of conference and guarantors:

• The use of new information and communication technologies in education
  PhDr. Michaela Tureckiová, CSc., MBA (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova) Charles University, Czech Republic
• The development and importance of transversal competences in the context of globalization
  prof. PaedDr. Miroslav Krystoň, CSc. (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici) Matej Bel University, Slovak Republic
• Further professional training in the era of automation and digitization
  doc. PaedDr. Ctibor Határ, PhD. (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre) Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovak Republic

	AUTOR	NÁZEV	PRACOVIŠTĚ
1	prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA PhDr. Martin Kursch, Ph.D.	Paradigma „Vzdělávání 4.0“ v éře digitalizace a globalizace	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
2	prof. PhDr. Gabriela Petrová, CSc. PaedDr. Nina Kozárová, PhD.	Rozvoj kritického myslenia andragógov vo vysokoškolskej príprave	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre
3	Dr.h.c. prof. PhDr. Beáta Kosová, CSc.	Rozvoj kompetencií doktorandov vo svelte medzinárodných trendov vo vede a spoločnosti	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
4	prof. PhDr. Mária Machalová, CSc.	Koncept edukačnej sociálnej práce - východiská	Inštitút výchovy a športu - IVŠ, Bratislava
5	prof. PhDr. Beáta Balogová, PhD.	Riziká digitálnej demencie u seniorov - realita či mýtus?	Fakulta humanitných a prírodných ved, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove
6	prof. dr. sc. Željko Dugac, Ph.D.	Transfer of knowledge in adult education: historical experiences on the example of health efucation in interwar time	Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Academy of Sciences and Arts, Croatian
7	prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA prof. PaedDr. Michal Nedělka, Dr.	Didaktická úloha digitálních technologii ve vzdělávání seniorů.	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
8	doc. Ing. Marta Matulčíková, PhD.	Podpora interdisciplinárneho prístupu v ďalšom ekonomicko-manažérskom vzdelávaní absolventov vybraných neekonomických študijných odborov	Ekonomická univerzita v Bratislave
9	dr. hab. Katarzyna Potyrala, prof. UP	Barriers and limitations in activities for sustainable development on the example of the Polish public pedagogical university - current status, perspectives and good models of intersectoral partnership	Pedagogical University of Cracow
10	dr Agnieszka Pawlak	dtto Potyrala	The Maria Grzegorzewska University
11	prof. PhDr. Igor Kominarec, PhD. doc. PhDr. Edita Kominarecová, PhD.	Teórie transformácie súčasnej vzdelanostnej spoločnosti	Fakulta humanitných a prírodných ved, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove
12	doc. PhDr. Nadežda Krajčová, PhD.	Kompetencie sociálneho pedagóga v ére globálnych problémov spoločnosti	Fakulta humanitných a prírodných ved, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove
13	doc. PaedDr. Lenka Pasternáková, PhD., MBA	Efektivizácia edukačného procesu v kontexte sociálnych sietí	Fakulta humanitných a prírodných ved, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove
14	PhDr inż. Łukasz Tomczyk Ph.D.	Level of knowledge of parents about media-related threats and characteristics of digital literacy of adults in education to safe use of new media	Pedagogical University of Cracow
15	prof. APS, dr hab. Ligia Tuszyńska	dtto Potyrala	The Maria Grzegorzewska University Warzsawa
16	plk. doc. Ing. Mgr. David Ullrich, Ph.D., MBA	Možné přístupy v přípravě a vzdělávání – kompetence vojenských profesionálů - leaderů	Univerzita obrany
17	Ph.D Anna Marianowska	Using Web 2.0 as a potential in adult education	Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw
18	Ph.D Zuzanna Wojciechowska	Functions of education from the perspective of experiencing changes in professional life by generations 30+ and 60+	Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw
19	PhDr. Michaela Tureckiová, CSc.	Význam a rozvoj transverzálních kompetencí klíčových pracovníků vzdělávacích organizací	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
20	Mgr. Ariadna Ciążela	Social Campaigns Promoting Environment Protection in Poland	The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warzsawa
21	Ing. Lucie Paulovčáková, Ph.D.	Analýza strategií a záměrů rozvoje vysokých škol v České republice a Velké Británii	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
22	PhDr. lng. lvan Bertl, Ph.D.	Analýza sebevzdělávacích stylů mladších dospělých a starších	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
23	PhDr. Slavomil Fischer, Ph.D. prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA	Adaptační potíže vybraných skupin dospělé populace v kontextu edukace a poradenství	Pedagogická fakulta Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
24	PhDr. Jiří Vronský	Řízené profesní vzdělávání v organizaci jako součást adaptace na technické změny v době digitalizace	Dr. Vronsky Consulting Roudnice nad Labem
25	doc. PhDr. Jana Šafránková, CSc.	Možnosti rozvoje transverzálních kompetencí	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
26	Ing. Petr Kazík, Ph.D.	Využití evaluačních nástrojů k zvýšení efektivity vzdělávání v LMS MOODLE	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
27	PhDr. Tomáš Majtner	Vzdělávací centra pro udržitelnou výstavbu – projektový záměr	Svaz podnikatelů ve stavebnictví v ČR
28	Ing. Mgr. Jan Tirpák	Perspektivy přírodovědného vzdělávání u učitelů v kontextu mezinárodních výzkumů	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
29	Prof. PhDr. Jan Průcha, DrSc., dr. h. c	Česká andragogická věda: stav a předpoklady budoucího rozvoje	Česká andragogická společnost
30	PhDr. Slavomil Fischer, Ph.D.	Vybrané problémy andragogiky ve vězeňství	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
31	PaedDr. Ing. Kateřina Bočková, Ph.D., MBA PaedDr. Dáša Porubčanová, PhD. Mgr. Monika Dohnanská	Aktivizační metody výuky v MBA profesním vzdělávání manažerů zaměřeném na projektový management	Vysoká škola Dubnický technický inštitut, Dubnica nad Váhom
32	doc. PaedDr. Ivan Pavlov, PhD. prof. PaedDr. M. Krystoň, CSc.	Možnosti podpory profesijného učenia a kariéry učiteľov na školách	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
33	PhDr. Ľubomír Kubínyi, Ph.D.	Motivace k účastí na dalším neformálním vzdělávání	Univerzita obrany
34	doc. Mgr. Ing. Radomír Saliger, Ph.D.	Využití multivariační analýzy ve výzkumu organizační kultury Armády České republiky - předpoklad dalšího rozvoje personálu.	Univerzita obrany
35	prof. PhDr. Soňa Kariková, PhD.	Možnosti poradenstva pre učiteľov v SR	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
36	PhDr. Ladislav Zilcher, Ph.D.	Sociální distance učitelů vůči osobám se znevýhodněním	Pedagogická fakulta Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
37	Mgr. Zdeněk Svoboda, Ph.D.	Potřeby učitelů v kontextu inkluzivního vzdělávání	Pedagogická fakulta Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
38	Mgr. Ing. Marian Valent, PhD.	Poradenstvo profesijného rozvoja pedagogických zamestnancov	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
39	dr hab. Nataliia Demeshkant PhD, assoc.prof.	Teachers’ University Net of Training – how to develop teachers’ digital skills?	Pedagogical University of Cracow
40	PhDr. Mgr. Roman Liška	Řízení kvality na německé střední odborné škole v Dolním Sasku	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova
41	Doc. PhDr. Ivana Pirohová, PhD.	Kritická reflexia a sebereflexia ve vzdelávání dospelých Rómov z marginalizovaných komunít	Fakulta humanitných a prírodných ved, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove
42	Ph.D Monika Gromadzka	EPALE - a virtual learning community	Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw
43	PhDr. PaedDr. Slávka Krásna, PhD. PaedDr. Silvia Barnová, PhD.	E-koučing a e-mentoring v rámci vzdelávania dospelých	Vysoká škola Dubnický technický inštitut, Dubnica nad Váhom
44	Mgr. Denisa Šukolová, PhD.	Vedecká kompetencia v kontextoch teórie, výskumu a praxe vzdelávania dospelých - aktuálne trendy a výzvy	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
45	PaedDr. Jana Hanuliaková, PhD. PaedDr. Dáša Porubčanová, PhD.	Pozitívna edukácia a potencionality človeka pre budúcnosť	Vysoká škola Dubnický technický inštitut, Dubnica nad Váhom
46	Mgr. Petr Adamec, Ph.D.	(Ne)Využívání e-learningových nástrojů při realizaci programů celoživotního vzdělávání na veřejné vysoké škole	Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Institut celoživotního vzdělávání
47	Mgr. Katarína Krejčíková Mgr. Michaela Sládkayová, PhD. Mgr. Barbora Vaněk, PhD	Marginalization as a subject of carreer advisory for teachers	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
48	Dr Tomasz Łączek	Adult life success	Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach, Polska
49	PhDr. Mgr. Romana Schunová	Informačné a komunikačné technológie vo vzdelávaní seniorov.	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre
50	PaedDr. Ing. Michal Slavík, PhD.	Zavádění prvků digitalizace v oblasti uplatňování principů restorativní justice v ČR	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
51	Mgr. Milan Chmura, Ph.D.	Profesně-pedagogická kompetence vysokoškolského učitele z pohledu studentů a akademických pracovníků	Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita
52	doc. PhDr. Josef Malach, CSc.	Teoretická východiska a strategie pro konceptualizaci Vzdělávání 4.0 pro oblast vzdělávání a učení dospělých	Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita
53	Mgr. Dana Vicherková, Ph.D.	Specifičnost elektronického vzdělávání učitelů na roli hodnotitelů ústní zkoušky v novém pojetí maturit v ČR	Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita
54	Ph. D Ewa Debska	Beliefs of middlen-aged learner towards the use of Web 2.0 in education	Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw
55	prof. PaedDr. Alena Douskova, PhD. Mgr. Dagmara Smalley	Development of teachers' professional competencies working in the educational centres of the Slovaks abroad	Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement requirements:

September 2019

Adult Education Conference (IAEC) Proceedings Publication Ethics & Publication Malpractice Statement

These guidelines are fully consistent with the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE) Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct. More details can be found here: https://publicationethics.org
We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all possible measures against publication malpractices. The IAEC Proceeding takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.

Duties and responsibilities of editors

In addition to general duties, such as constantly improving the quality and integrity of the conference proceeding, the editors accept obligation to apply best will and practice to cope with the following responsibilities:

Editorial Board

Editorial board will be generated from recognized experts in the field. The editor will provide full names and affiliations of the members as well as updated contact information for the editorial office on the conference proceeding webpage.

Publication decisions

The editor should be responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the conference proceeding should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the conference proceeding’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. The final decision for publication is taken by the managing editor.

Peer review process

All a conference proceeding’s content should be subjected to peer-review. Articles submitted for possible publication are subjected to a double-blind, peer review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to at least one expert in the field of the paper. Referee(s) are asked to classify the paper as publishable immediately, publishable with amendments and improvements, or not publishable. Referees’ evaluations usually include an explicit recommendation of what to do with the manuscript. Referees’ comments are then shared (anonymously) with the author. Editors should be ready to justify any important deviation from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication unless serious problems are identified. Editors should publish guidance to either authors and reviewers on everything that is expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and will refer or link this code.

Fair play

Editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors´ decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper´s importance, originality and clarity, and the study´s relevance to the aim of conference proceeding.

Confidentiality

Editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author and the reviewer(s). Editors will ensure that material submitted remains confidential while under review.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication.

Procedures for dealing with unethical behaviour

Unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone. Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct should provide enough information and evidence for an investigation to be initiated. Every reported act of unethical publishing behaviour must be investigated, even if it is discovered years after publication.
The editor will take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper. Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, depending on the misconduct seriousness.
Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the need to consult more widely. In any event, the author should be given the opportunity to respond to any allegations.

Serious misconduct might require application of one or more following measures:

• Informing or educating the author or reviewer where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards.
• Publication of a formal notice detailing the misconduct.
• A formal letter to the head of the author’s or reviewer’s department or funding agency.
• Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the conference proceeding, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer’s department.
• Imposition of a formal embargo on contributions from an individual for a defined period.

Duties and responsibilities of authors

Publication is free

Authors pay neither submission nor publication fee. Authors pay neither submission nor publication fee beyond eventual conference registration fee. Full information about fees must be clearly stated on the proceeding´s website before authors begin preparing thein manuscript for submission.

Open Access Policy

The conference proceeding is freely available online. Authors are required to agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles. Users can copy and redistribute the material in printed or electronic format and build upon the material, without further permission or fees being required, provided that appropriate credit is given.

Reporting standards

Authors of papers should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial „opinion‟ works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Plagiarism takes many forms, from „passing off ‟ another´s paper as the author´s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another´s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one conference proceeding or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one conference proceeding concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another conference proceeding a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported work.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible. Readers should be informed about who has funded research and on the role of the funders in the research.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author´s obligation to promptly notify the conference proceeding editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duties and responsibilities of reviewers

Contribution to editorial decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication. Authors who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer´s own research without the written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Date of the event:

11 and 12 december 2018, Prague (Václavské náměstí 31)

Payment information
conference fee / publishing contribution

APPLICATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE "ADULT EDUCATION 2018"

BILLING INFORMATION:
Title, First and Last Name:
Organization (non-abbreviated name):
Exact address:

Organisation ID No:       Tax ID No:
Phone:
E-mail:
Date, Signature:

I agree to the use of the provided personal data and the possible use of photographs taken during the event - the International Conference "Adult Education 2018". The provided personal data will be treated in accordance with Act No. 101/2000 Coll., on the Protection of Personal Data.

Based on the above data, you will be issued with an invoice - a tax document.

Account Holder: Charles University, Faculty of Education, Magdalény Rettigové 4, 116 39 Praha

Foreign participants pay in EUR:
Name and Address of the Account holder: Charles University, Faculty of Education, Magdalény Rettigové 4, 116 39 Praha 1
Name of Bank: Komerční banka, a. s.
Address of Bank: Spalena 51, Prague 1, 110 00
SWIFT CODE: KOMBCZPPXXX
IBAN: CZ7101000000435903560247
VS: 894718
Enter the name of the participant.

Program ke stažení zde

Program to download here

i