Adult Education 2019 – in the context of professional development and social capital

9th International Scientific Conference

Auspices:

prof. PaedDr. Radka Wildová, CSc.
Vice-Rector for the Concept and Quality of Educational Activities

Professional guarantors:

prof. PaedDr. Michal Nedělka, Dr.
Dean of the Faculty of Education, Charles University
prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA
Chairman of the Czech Andragogical Society, Faculty of Education, Charles University

Conference Organizer:

Faculty of Education, Charles University in cooperation with the Czech Andragogical Society

The organization is provided by:

Department of Adult Education and Management, Faculty of Education, Charles University and Czech Andragogical Society, Prague

Outputs:

Accepted papers will be published in the Proceedings of Adult Education 2019 (ISBN 978-80-906894-8-0 and ISSN 2571-3841).
The previous edition was included in the Web of Science database and 2018 was sent to Scopus for indexing.


Download:

Application
Scientific Committee of the Conference
Informations for contributors
Information about the conference
Conference program

Publication

Information for contributors

Adult Education 2019 – in the Context of Professional Development and Social Capital

Texts should be sent electronically to: info@candrs.cz no later than January 31, 2020 (in Word format). Proceedings of the 9th International Adult Education Conference 2019 - ISBN 978-80-906894-8-0 and ISSN 2571-3841 will be published by the Czech Andragogic Society, Prague, with the participation of the Faculty of Education of Charles University.
Again, it will be asked to be included in the WoS (Conference Proceedings Citation Index) and Scopus database.


Following the successful review process, the following will be accepted for publication:
Empirical studies (in exceptional cases theoretical and review studies), which must be between 6 and 8 standard pages (ie 10,800-14,400 characters including spaces); Times New Roman font, font size 12. No graphic or other modifications.
Texts will be published in the author's English language.
All page margins: 2.5 cm, single line spacing. Paragraph indent - first line 0.75 cm; do not use spaces or give points for paragraphs or subtitles.


Contribution structure:
Title of the text; the name (s) of the author (s); abstract; Keywords; the text itself and the exact contact details of the author (s). Workplace name abbreviations cannot be used !!! (It is necessary to write the exact official name of the department, faculty and university).

Example:

Development of competence paradigm in educational sciences
The development of competency-based paradigm educational sciences
Jan Novák

Abstract:
text in English

Key words:
4-6 words or phrases in English (for English texts they are listed in Czech)

The text of the paper follows

Structure of the text:
Introduction; own text divided into chapters (eg 1st, 2nd,…); conclusion; literature (APA citation standard) and contact to the author (including titles and address of the workplace, ie street, number and postal code and e-mail addresses). Please write exact names of faculties of universities and departments, do not use abbreviations! Insert tables and graphs as pictures. The name of the table / chart / figure is as follows: Table 1: table title, Chart 1: chart name… Under each picture / table / chart there is a source, for example: Source: Armstrong (1999, p. 52) or Source: own processing.

Example of study structure:

Introduction
Text….

1. Chapter breakdown (optional, but appropriate)
Text….

2. Division into chapters (not obligatory but appropriate) - Methodology
Text….

3. Division into chapters (not obligatory but appropriate) - Interpretation of results / Discussion
Text….

Conclusion (or Research Summary / Recommendations for Practice / Proposal for Process Optimization)
Text….

References (APA)

References in the text
The author's name and the year of publication of the cited source are given directly in the text in the form of name, year in parentheses (Peterson, 2014). When two or more authors have cited text, their names are joined by & (Arkon & Schön, 2016; Novak, Larson, & Kordak, 2017). When referring to multiple sources, they are all listed in alphabetical order in one parenthesis and separated by a semicolon (Jarvis, 2004; Kolb, 1984; Maier, 2016). The location of the pages from which it was cited is indicated by a comma in parentheses directly per year (Adams, 2016, p. 114).

Example:
References (APA citation standard)
Dočekal, K. (2012). Prožitkové, zážitkové, nebo zkušenostní učení? E-pedagogium, 12(1), 9–17. Dostupné z http://www.pdf.upol.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/PdF/e-pedagogium/2012/E-pedagogium-2012.pdf
Hrbková, P. (2018). Proměna kultury školy v pedagogických diskurzech. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
Larsson, E. (Ed.). (2010). Playing reality. Dostupné z http://interactingarts.org/pdf/Playing%-20Reality%20(2010).pdf
Maňák, J., & Janík, T. (Eds.). (2005). Orientace české základní školy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
Šeďová, K. (2012). Žáci se smějí učitelům: Podoby a funkce školního humoru zaměřeného na učitele. Pedagogická orientace, 22(1), 41–65.
Veenman, M., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuisen, J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89–104.
Zounek, J., & Šeďová, K. (2009). Učitelé a technologie. Mezi tradičním a moderním pojetím. Brno: Paido.
It is not allowed to use publisher abbreviations etc. in the records !!!

Example - do not shorten, do not use shortcuts !!!:
Contact information:
Assoc. PhDr. Jan Novak, CSc.
Department of Education
Faculty of Arts
Charles University
U.S. Jan Palach 2
116 38 Prague 1, Czech Republic
Email: novak@cuni.cz

Scientific Committee of the Conference

Adult Education 2019 – in the context of professional development and social capital

prof. PhDr. Beáta Balogová, PhD. Filozofická fakulta, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově (Slovakia)
prof. PhDr. Martin Bílek, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
doc. Mgr. Miroslav Dopita, Ph.D. Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci (Czech Republic)
doc. PaedDr. Pavel Doulík, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně (Czech Republic)
doc. PaedDr. Ctibor Határ, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre (Slovakia)
prof. PhDr. Soňa Kariková, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici (Slovakia)
doc. dr Ali Murat Kirik Marmara University, Faculty of Communication (Turkey)
prof. PhDr. Beáta Kosová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici (Slovakia)
doc. PhDr. Nadežda Krajčová, PhD. Fakulta humanitných a prírodných vied, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově
prof. PaedDr. Miroslav Krystoň, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici (Slovakia)
prof. dr. Natalia Ivanivna Lazarenko Vinnytsia Pedagogical University (Ukraine)
prof. dr. Elma Selmanagić Lizde University of Sarajevo (Bosna & Herzegovina)
prof. dr. Larysa Lukianova, ak. National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (Ukraine)
doc. PhDr. Josef Malach, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita (Czech Republic)
Ph.D Anna Marianowska Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)
prof. Regina Motz, PhD. Universidad de la República, Montevideo (Uruguya)
doc. PaedDr. Marianna Müller de Morais, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre (Slovakia)
prof. PhDr. Milan Nakonečný Česká andragogická společnost (Czech Republic)
prof. PaedDr. Michal Nedělka, Dr. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
doc. PaedDr. Lenka Pasternáková, PhD. Fakulta humanitných a prírodných vied, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově
doc. PaedDr. Ivan Pavlov, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici (Slovakia)
prof. PhDr. Gabriela Petrová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre (Slovakia)
doc. PhDr. Ivana Pirohová, PhD. Fakulta humanitných a prírodných vied, Prešovská univerzita v Prešově
dr. hab Beata Pituła, prof. nzw. w Pol. Śl. Silesian University of Technology, College of Social Sciences and Foreign Philologies (Poland)
dr hab. prof. UP Katarzyna Potyrała Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow (Poland)
prof. PhDr. Jan Průcha, DrSc., dr. h. c. Česká andragogická společnost (Czech Republic)
prof. PhDr. Viera Prusáková, CSc. Vysoká škola ekonómie a manažmentu verejnej správy v Bratislave (Slovakia)
dr hab. prof. UP Andrzej Ryk Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow (Poland)
doc. Ing. Mgr. Radomír Saliger, Ph.D. Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany (Czech Republic)
prof. Ismar Frango Silveira Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, Sao Paulo (Brazil)
prof. dr Lazar Stošić The Association for the Development of Science, Engineering and Education, Belgarde (Serbia)
dr hab. Zofia Szarota, prof. ucz. Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)
doc. PhDr. Jana Marie Šafránková, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
doc. PhDr. Jiří Škoda, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně (Czech Republic)
PhDr. Michaela Tureckiová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
plk. doc. Mgr. Ing. David Ullrich, Ph.D., MBA Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany (Czech Republic)
doc. PhDr. Ladislav Vaska, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici
prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
prof. PaedDr. Radka Wildová, CSc. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)



Organizační a programový výbor konference:
Organizational and Programme Committee of the Conference:

PhDr. Ing. Ivan Bertl, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně (Czech Republic)
PhDr. Slavomil Fischer, Ph.D., MBA Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně (Czech Republic)
Mgr. Milan Chmura, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita (Czech Republic)
Mgr. Danuše Dvořáková Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
PhDr. Dominika Kadlubeková, PhD. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre (Slovakia)
PhDr. Jana Kohnová, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
PhDr. Ľubomír Kubínyi, Ph.D. Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany (Czech Republic)
PhDr. Martin Kursch, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
Ing. Lucie Paulovčáková, Ph.D., MBA Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
Mgr. Zuzana Svobodová, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
Mgr. Ing. Leopold Skoruša, Ph.D. Univerzita obrany v Brně (Czech Republic)
Mgr. Zuzana Svobodová, Ph.D. Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
ing PhDr. Łukasz Tomczyk, PhD Faculty of Pedagogy, Pedagogical University of Cracow (Poland)
RNDr. Ing. Eva Urbanová Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova (Czech Republic)
Mgr. Zuzanna Wojciechowska, Ph.D Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)

Thematic blocks of conference and guarantors:

  • Trends in professional development management
    PhDr. Michaela Tureckiová, CSc., MBA (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova) Charles University, Czech Republic
  • The importance of social and cultural capital in the 21st century
    prof. PaedDr. Miroslav Krystoň, CSc. (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici) Matej Bel University, Slovak Republic
  • Seniors - quality of life in the context of lifelong learning
    doc. PaedDr. Ctibor Határ, PhD. (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre) Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • E-poster section: Presentation of research results in the field of continuing education, management and leadership
    PhDr. Martin Kursch, Ph.D. (Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova) Charles University, Czech Republic

Accepted Papers

Adult Education 2019 – in the Context of Professional Development and Social Capital

Time management v širším kontextu se zaměřením na pracovníky v oblasti vzdělávání
Time management in a broader context with a focus on education staff
Ing. Lucie Paulovčáková, Ph.D., MBA; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Evalvačná reflexia andragogických kompetencií vysokoškolského učiteľa
Andragogical competences of university teacher Evaluation reflection
prof. PaedDr. Miroslav Krystoň, CSc.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Přístupy k profesnímu rozvoji různých skupin pracovníků
Approaches to professional development of different groups of employees
PhDr. Michaela Tureckiová, CSc. MBA; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Vliv služebního hodnocení na profesní rozvoj vojáků
Influence of service evaluation on professional development of soldiers
PhDr. Ľubomír Kubínyi, Ph.D.; Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany v Brně

Specifika edukace personálu Ministerstva obrany České republiky
Specifics of education of personnel of the Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic
doc. Mgr. Ing. Radomír Saliger, Ph.D.; Fakulta vojenského leadershipu, Univerzita obrany v Brně

Komparatívny pohľad na modely podpory učiteľov pri zvyšovaní kvality vyučovania na vysokých školách
Comparative view on support models in improving the quality of teaching in higher education
Mgr. Denisa Šukolová, PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Rozvoj kompetenci pracovníků domovů seniorů
The copmetency development of emlployees in houses for seniors
PhDr. Jiří Vronský; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Vazba mezi pracovním výkonem a složkami nadání
Interaction between work performance and talent components
PhDr. Martin Kursch, Ph.D. – prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D., MBA; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Řízení kvality na střední škole
High school quality management
PhDr. Mgr. Roman Liška, MBA; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Rozvoj profesijných kompetencií učiteľov pôsobiacich vo vzdelávacích centrách Slovákov v zahraničí
Development of teachers’ professional competencies working in the educational centres of the Slovaks abroad
prof. PaedDr. Alena Doušková, PhD. – prof. PhDr. Soňa Kariková, PhD.
– Mgr. Dagmara Smalley; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Múdrosť ako cieľová kategória celoživotného učenia?
Wisdom as a target category of lifelong learning?
Mgr. Martin Schubert, PhD. – Mgr. Zuzana Neupauer; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Motivace učitelů základních škol k profesnímu výkonu na Slovensku
Motivation of primary school teachers to professional performance in Slovakia
PaedDr. Ing. Jan Tirpák; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem
PaedDr. Miriam Uhrinová PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Katolícka univerzita v Ružomberku

K rozvoji manažerských dovedností budoucích ředitelů škol v ČR
A contribution to the development of managerial skills of prospective headmasters in the Czech Republic
doc. Ing. Helena Vomáčková, CSc.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Andragogické poradenstvo pre učiteľov v oblasti rozvoja kritického myslenia
Andragogical counselling for teachers in the field of critical thinking development
Mgr. Michaela Sládkayová, PhD. – Mgr. Katarína Krejčíková; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Projekt Smart Ecosystem for Learning and Inclusion – předpoklady, akce a výzvy při realizaci mezinárodního vzdělávacího projektu
Smart Ecosystem for Learning and Inclusion Project – assumptions, actions and challenges in the implementation of an international educational project
PhDr. inż. Łukasz Tomczyk Ph.D.; Pedagogical University of Cracow (Poland)

Adaptační potíže u vybraných skupin populace jako problém pro andragogiku
Adaptation problems at selected groups of population as a problem for andragogy
PhDr. Slavomil Fischer, Ph.D., MBA; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Virtual learning communities on example of closed groups in social media – case study
PhD Zuzanna Wojciechowska; Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)

Determinanty profesijného rozvoja začínajúceho učiteľa
Determinants of beginning teacher professional development
doc. PaedDr. Lívia Fenyvesiová, PhD. – Mgr. Margita Feranská, PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozova v Nitre

Účinnost prevence v kontextu manažmentu školy
Effectiveness of prevention in kontext school management
doc. PaedDr. Gabriela Gabrhelová, PhD. – PaedDr. Jana Čubirková; Vysoká škola DTI, Dubnica nad Váhom

Zážitkové učenie ako potenciál rozvoja pedagógov
Experiential learning as a potential for educator development
PaedDr. Alexandra Pavličková, PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozova v Nitre

Andragogické poradenstvo dospelým – inštitucionálny a individuálny aspekt
Andragogical counselling for adults – institutional and individual aspect
doc. PaedDr. Ivan Pavlov, PhD. – Mgr. Kristína Kubišová; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Manažment vzdelávania a poradenstva dospelým – teoretické východiská
Management of education and counselling for adults – theoretical framework
doc. PaedDr. Ivan Pavlov, PhD. – Mgr. Michaela Skúpa, PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Komparace profesijních standardů Slovenské, České republiky a Ruskej federace
Comparison of professional standards of the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic and the Russian Federation
Mgr. Ing. Marian Valent, PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Řešení chronické nezaměstnanosti z pohledu andragogiky
The solution of chronical unemlouyment from view of andragogy
Ing. Ivana Kratochvílová, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Názory vysokoškolských učiteľov na rozvoj ich profesijných kompetencií v oblasti vyučovania
University teachers' views on the development of their professional competences in the field of teaching
Mgr. Petra Fridrichová, PhD.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici

Spokojenost s pracovním prostředím na vysoké škole v souvislosti s HR Award
Satisfaction with the working environment at the university in connection with HR Award
Mgr. Petr Adamec, Ph.D.; Institut celoživotního vzdělávání, Mendelova univerzita v Brně

Potřeby dalšího vzdělávání ředitelů škol v kontextu profesního rozvoje
Further education needs of school heads in the context of professional development
RNDr. Ing. Eva Urbanová – PhDr. Romana Lisnerová – doc. PhDr. Jana Marie Šafránková, CSc.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Změny komunikačních dovedností vysokoškolských studentů
Changes in communication skills of university students
prof. PhDr. Jiří Škoda, Ph.D. – prof. PaedDr. Pavel Doulík, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

“New Professionalism” – challenges and limitations for learning in the workplace in medium adulthood
dr Krzysztof Pierścieniak; Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)

Development of Key Competences for Lifelong Learning in higher education process – case study of andragogical specialization Soft skills trainer at the Faculty of Education at the University of Warsaw
PhD Anna Marianowska; Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)

International approaches to adults' functional literacy development
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sc. Nataliia Avsheniuk; Ivan Ziaziun Institute of Adult and Pedagogical Education, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv (Ukraine)

Autonomie škol v oblasti lidských zdrojů pohledem vedoucích pracovníků
Autonomy of schools in the field of human resources from the perspective of the school executives
Mgr. Zuzana Svobodová, Ph.D., Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Kognitivní rehabilitace jako součást edukace osob trpících Alzheimerovou chorobou s podporou sociální adaptability
Cognitive rehabilitation as a part of education of people suffering from Alzheimer´s disease with support of social adaptability
PhDr. Mgr. Michal Vostrý, Ph.D. – PhDr. Arnošt Smolík, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Analýza připravenosti pedagogů na řešení krizových situací jako východisko pro další vzdělávání
Analysis of the preparedness of pedagogues for dealing with crisis situations as a basis for their further education
PhDr. Arnošt Smolík, Ph.D. – Mgr. Zdeněk Svoboda, Ph.D. – Mgr. Laura P. Dostálová; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Vzdělávání akademických pracovníků Univerzity Karlovy v oblasti pedagogických dovedností
Training of academic staff of Charles University in the field of pedagogical skills
PhDr. Michal Zvírotský, Ph.D. – prof. PaedDr. Radka Wildová, CSc. – Ing. Karolina Duschinská, Ph.D. – PhDr. Radka High, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova

Komparace vzdělávacích programů vybraných nelékařských oborů studovaných na vyšší zdravotnické škole
A comparison of educational programs of selected non-medical fields at higher medical schools
PhDr. Martina Muknšnáblová; Vyšší odborná škola zdravotnická MILLS Čelákovice a Vysoká škola tělesné výchovy a sportu Palestra Praha

Kariérny rast edukátora pôsobiaceho v sociálno-edukačnej starostlivosti o dospelých
Career growth of educators working in social-education care of adults
Mgr. Miroslava Debnáriková; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Konštantína Filozova v Nitre

Senioři a jejich další vzdělávaní
Seniors and their further education
doc. PaedDr. Lenka Pasternáková, PhD. – MBA, PaedDr. Branislav Tkáč, MBA; Fakulta humanitných a prírodných ved, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove

Success in life – terminology and results of scientific research
Dr Tomasz Łączek; Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce (Poland)

Motivační faktory dospělých k dalšímu vzdělávání
Motivation factors of adult for further education
PhDr. Ing. Ivan Bertl, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Social functions of adult education in the perspective of learning in adulthood
dr hab. Zofia Szarota, prof. ucz.; Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)

Porozumění konceptu inkluzivního vzdělávání jako východisko prointegrační orientace učitele
Understanding the concept of inclusive education as the basis for the teacher's pro-integration orientation
Mgr. Zdeněk Svoboda, Ph.D. – PhDr. Ladislav Zilcher, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Možnosti pracovního uplatnění mladých dospělých Romů žijících v sociálně vyloučených lokalitách
Possibilities of employment of young adult Roma living in socially excluded localities
prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Veteška, Ph.D. – MBA, Bc. Jaroslav Kříž; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

Middle-age people's decision-making in constructing their career
PhD Ewa Dębska; Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw (Poland)

Profesní jistota a potřeby pedagogů ve vztahu ke vzdělávání žáků se sociálním znevýhodněním
Professional certainty and needs of teachers in relation to education of socially disadvantaged pupils
Mgr. Zdeněk Svoboda, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

The System of adult education in Ukraine: Current state and perspectives of development
Prof. Dr. Sc. Larysa Lukianova; Ivan Ziaziun Institute of Adult and Pedagogical Education, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv (Ukraine)

Znalost postižení jako prediktor sociálního odmítnutí u učitelů
Teachers knowledge of disability as a predictor of social distance
PhDr. Ladislav Zilcher, Ph.D. – Mgr. Zdeněk Svoboda, Ph.D. – PhDr. Vlastimil Chytrý, Ph.D. – Mgr. Barbora Růžičková, Ph.D.; Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem



Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement requirements:

September 2019


Adult Education Conference (IAEC) Proceedings Publication Ethics & Publication Malpractice Statement

These guidelines are fully consistent with the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE) Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct. More details can be found here: https://publicationethics.org
We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all possible measures against publication malpractices. The IAEC Proceeding takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.

Duties and responsibilities of editors

In addition to general duties, such as constantly improving the quality and integrity of the conference proceeding, the editors accept obligation to apply best will and practice to cope with the following responsibilities:

Editorial Board

Editorial board will be generated from recognized experts in the field. The editor will provide full names and affiliations of the members as well as updated contact information for the editorial office on the conference proceeding webpage.

Publication decisions

The editor should be responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the conference proceeding should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the conference proceeding’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. The final decision for publication is taken by the managing editor.

Peer review process

All a conference proceeding’s content should be subjected to peer-review. Articles submitted for possible publication are subjected to a double-blind, peer review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to at least one expert in the field of the paper. Referee(s) are asked to classify the paper as publishable immediately, publishable with amendments and improvements, or not publishable. Referees’ evaluations usually include an explicit recommendation of what to do with the manuscript. Referees’ comments are then shared (anonymously) with the author. Editors should be ready to justify any important deviation from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication unless serious problems are identified. Editors should publish guidance to either authors and reviewers on everything that is expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and will refer or link this code.

Fair play

Editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors´ decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper´s importance, originality and clarity, and the study´s relevance to the aim of conference proceeding.

Confidentiality

Editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author and the reviewer(s). Editors will ensure that material submitted remains confidential while under review.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication.

Procedures for dealing with unethical behaviour

Unethical behaviour may be identified and brought to the attention of the editor and publisher at any time, by anyone. Whoever informs the editor or publisher of such conduct should provide enough information and evidence for an investigation to be initiated. Every reported act of unethical publishing behaviour must be investigated, even if it is discovered years after publication.
The editor will take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper. Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, depending on the misconduct seriousness.
Minor misconduct might be dealt with without the need to consult more widely. In any event, the author should be given the opportunity to respond to any allegations.

Serious misconduct might require application of one or more following measures:

  • Informing or educating the author or reviewer where there appears to be a misunderstanding or misapplication of acceptable standards.
  • Publication of a formal notice detailing the misconduct.
  • A formal letter to the head of the author’s or reviewer’s department or funding agency.
  • Formal retraction or withdrawal of a publication from the conference proceeding, in conjunction with informing the head of the author or reviewer’s department.
  • Imposition of a formal embargo on contributions from an individual for a defined period.

Duties and responsibilities of authors
Publication is free

Authors pay neither submission nor publication fee. Authors pay neither submission nor publication fee beyond eventual conference registration fee. Full information about fees must be clearly stated on the proceeding´s website before authors begin preparing thein manuscript for submission.

Open Access Policy

The conference proceeding is freely available online. Authors are required to agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles. Users can copy and redistribute the material in printed or electronic format and build upon the material, without further permission or fees being required, provided that appropriate credit is given.

Reporting standards

Authors of papers should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial „opinion‟ works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Plagiarism takes many forms, from „passing off ‟ another´s paper as the author´s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another´s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one conference proceeding or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one conference proceeding concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another conference proceeding a previously published paper.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported work.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible. Readers should be informed about who has funded research and on the role of the funders in the research.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author´s obligation to promptly notify the conference proceeding editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.


Duties and responsibilities of reviewers
Contribution to editorial decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication. Authors who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer´s own research without the written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Date of the event:

11 and 12 December 2019, Prague (Faculty of Education, Charles University, Myslíkova 7)

Platební podmínky – úhrada konferenčního poplatku


Konferenční poplatek:

2 500 Kč
100 EUR
(zahrnuje účast na konferenci a publikování jednoho příspěvku ve sborníku)


Způsob úhrady konferenčního poplatku

1. pro účastníky z ČR:
Majitel účtu: Česká andragogická společnost, z. s.
Banka: Fio banka, a.s.
Adresa banky: V Celnici 1028/10, 117 21 Praha 1, ČR
Číslo účtu: 2500244959/2010
Do poznámky uveďte jméno účastníka

2. for foreign participants paying in EUR:
Name and Address of the Acount holder: Česká andragogická společnost, z. s. (Czech Andragogy Society)
Name of Bank: Fio banka, a.s.
Address of Bank: V Celnici 1028/10, 117 21 Praha 1, Czech Republic
IBAN: CZ7320100000002001111297
BIC/SWIFT: FIOBCZPPXXX
Do poznámky uveďte jméno účastníka / Enter the name of the participant in the note

i